Where to ride? Well, bike this way

August 22, 2006

MySpace, YouTube, Friendster. These are communities that have grown in popularity. I have always wondered what could bring the cycling community together. Well, here is a novel shot at it. The site is Bike This Way.

Want to know good routes to ride when you travel? This site aims to answer that question. Submit your favorite rides. Enjoy the rides of other cyclists. If we all add to the knowledge base, we can map out quality rides everywhere.

header01.jpg

My in-laws live in Savannah Georgia, My parents in Pennsylvania. We take trips up and down the East Coast. I have always tried to figure out routes by looking at maps and trial and error. Just when I figure out some nice roads, vacation is over.

I have always wanted to ride some nice climbs in Vermont. I think this site has some sticking power. Pass this one on!


Bjarne Riis to Ivan Basso, Can you stay at arms length?

August 22, 2006

I was once told that in life, you have no true friends or no true enemies. The reason is that people act in their own self interests. When those intrests align, then you are friends. The more I go through life, the more I see this advice playing out. People I thought were true friends surprise and dissapoint me. I am not cynical enough to buy the above saying fully but…

Another piece of evidence in the “true firends” argument is the case with CSC. In today’s procycling, Bjarne Riis has put clear distance betrween himself and Ivan Basso:

“I’m fighting to create a clean team, and thus a clean sport – that’s my goal. And if, even if Basso is cleared, there is even the slightest doubt remaining, there will be a cloud over the whole team and over me. That’s not good enough,”

Riis further goes down the road by saying:

“I find it hard to see a future for Basso at CSC – unless he is totally cleared. By that I mean that he has never been in contact with Fuentes, and that it isn’t him who figures on the doctor’s lists, either.

Ivan, sounds like the father figure that you turned down the Discovery money to be with, just told you to pack your bags.


The end of the line for Jakob Piil?

August 22, 2006

One very conspicious rider absent from the Vuelta team for CSC is super domestique, Jakob Piil. For years, Jakob has worked selflessly for his team. In 2004, I had the opportunity to meet Jakob during a training ride in Philadelphia prior to the USPRO race. I found Jakob to be as good a person as he is a rider. That year he won the most agressive rider in the Tour de France. He and Jens Voight are two class acts that bring nothing but good press to the sponsor, CSC. I would have loved to see Bjarne find a spot for him here.

Will we see Jakob in another kit next year?
jd11.jpg

Photo ©: Jonathan Devich/Cyclingnews.com


CSC announces it’s Veulta Line-up

August 22, 2006

111.jpg

CSC is lining up to make a serious run at putting Carlos Sastre on the top step of the podium at the upcoming Vuelta. Here are the riders: Carlos Sastre, Fabian Cancellara, Volodymir Gustov, Lars Bak, Kurt Asle Arvesen, Inigo Cuesta, Marcus Ljungqvist, Nicki Sørensen and Stuart O’Grady.

“To me this is definitely the strongest team we’ve ever had in the Vuelta. We have proud traditions from last year with a stage win and podium spot, so there’s a lot to live up to. And we can with this team. Carlos Sastre has told us he’s top motivated to do well, and that means we have to provide him with the best possible support. He has been tremendous this year and deserves the opportunity to get a great result in the Vuelta. As always it will be a tough race and the spectators can expect some amazing stages for sure,” says sports director Kim Andersen


Tyler Hamilton in the news again

August 22, 2006

As Tyler Hamilton looks to return to the ProTour in less than a month, he showed that he has maintained much of the form that led him to be a favorite in the 2004 Tour de France. On Saturday, Hamilton won the Mount Washington Hill Climb in New Hampshire.

You may recall that Tyler is not allowed to race in any sanctioned event no matter how small. In fact, professionals who rode with Tyler during a criterium series benefiting Tyler’s charity were told they too faced possible action for riding with a rider under suspension.

tyler_hamilton_hanging_outtnl.jpg
Photo ©: Matt Benassi
All the Tyler Hamilton news is not good however. News from the Operation Puerto investigation is linking “Rider 4142″ to Hamilton. By comparing the doping schedule and racing schedule with certain riders in 2003, the Spanish police have concluded that rider 4142 is Tyler Hamilton. Tyler has not made any public statement since this news first started to leak out in June. From his website:

June 26, 2006
I was very upset to read the accusations against me and to see my name associated with the “Operacion Puerto” investigation in Spain. I have not been treated by Dr. Fuentes. I have not done what the article alleges. In addition, I have never been contacted by authorities in Spain regarding these allegations. Therefore, it is impossible to comment on a situation I have no knowledge of.

We do need to be careful here. Already, 5 Astana riders and virtually all of the Comunitat Valenciana team have been exonorated after being linked to Operation Puerto.

Now UCI president, Pat McQuaid, has already put two stakes in the ground. The first is that Tyler’s suspension is actually four years, not two since his suspension was finalized in 2005 after Hamilton’s unsuccessful appeal to the CAS.

The second stake is that given this “new” information, Tyler faces a lifetime ban for a second offence. As quoted before this year’s Tour de France:

“With the evidence which we seem to see in this dossier, he’s gone for life,” McQuaid said “The implications for the riders in the case are two years from WADA code and two years from the ProTour, that’s four years. And Hamilton, a ban for life. That would be a second offense.”

McQuaid faces two problems here. Taking either stand will cause embarrassment at the very least. First, in its ruling, the Court of Arbitration in Sport (CAS) found Hamilton guilty and set his suspension date at September 23, 2004. Thus granting him a 2 year suspension. The additional 2 years was imposed for doping offenses occuring after Jan 2005. Pat must know the rules. If he dosen’t, ask David Millar who is back to racing after a similar ruling. In case you are reading Pat, here is the official ruling from the CAS:

ON THESE GROUNDS:
The Court of Arbitration for Sport hereby rules:

  1. The appeal filed by Mr Tyler Hamilton against the award dated 18 April 2005 rendered by the AAA Panel is dismissed.
  2. Mr Tyler Hamilton is ineligible to compete in cycling races for two years from 23 September 2004 until 22 September 2006.
  3. All questions of costs are reserved for consideration and will be the subject of a separate award.

Done in Lausanne, 10 February 2006

McQuaid’s second problem is his opinion that evidence from Operation Puerto is a second offence. That can’t be true. At most, it is confirmation of Tyler Hamilton’s guilt. He was already found guilty of doping during this time frame. If the UCI can prove Tyler Hamilton is rider 4142, then they now know how he did it. That is all.

Pat, if you push this, you are coming off as looking for publicity and not fairness. I don’t care how you feel towards doping. Apply the rules fairly and justly. That is what will give you the respect you need to govern the UCI. Focus on repairing the split between the ProTour and the Grand Tours. That is a problem of your making and needs attention.

The ultimate irony is that even if Tyler was subject to the ProTour’s additional 2 year ban, he could still ride the three Grand Tours, Paris Nice, Milan San Remo, Paris-Roubaix and a bunch of other great races.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 109 other followers